REVIEW

Download the review form for the review form.doc

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE ………………………………………………………………………………….

1. General value of the article
2. a) contains substantial scientific novelty
3. b) makes considerable scientific contribution
4. c) confirms the current results
5. d) does not correspond to the journal specification
6. Methodology of the research
7. a) corresponds to needs of the article
8. b) improper presented
9. c) does not correspond to needs of the article
10. Initial data
11. a) sufficient
12. b) insufficient
13. Statistical investigation
14. a) sufficient
15. b) can be accepted after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
16. c) insufficient
17. Illustrations
18. a) acceptable in quality and quantity
19. b) quality of the illustration № ………………. is improper
20. c) can be corrected
21. d) unacceptable
22. Tables and figures
23. a) acceptable
24. b) need improvement
25. c) unacceptable or improper
26. Interpretation of the research results
27. a) acceptable
28. b) can be accepted after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
29. c) unacceptable or not understandable
30. d) inconclusive
31. Used literature
32. a) acceptable in quality and quantity
33. b) unacceptable because of insufficient number of entries
34. c) unacceptable because of low quality (old, designed with violation of the requirements, etc.)
35. d) lack of well-known (classic) sources concerning the article topic
36. Units of measurement
37. a) appropriate
38. b) inappropriate
39. Summary
40. a) correct
41. b) does not (completely) reveal idea of the article
42. c) needs radical elaboration
43. Assessment of linguistic aspect of the work
44. a) good
45. b) needs improvement
46. c) needs radical elaboration
47. General assessment and proposals concerning the article publication
48. a) very good – can be accepted and published
49. b) good – can be accepted and published after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
50. c) can be accepted and published after radical elaboration
51. d) cannot be published in the “Journal of Lviv National Agrarian University”

COMMENTS of the reviewer ABOUT assessment of the article:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

reviewer’s signature

Scientific degree and academic title, full name of the reviewer