REVIEW
Download the review form for the review form.doc
TITLE OF THE ARTICLE ………………………………………………………………………………….
- General value of the article
- a) contains substantial scientific novelty
- b) makes considerable scientific contribution
- c) confirms the current results
- d) does not correspond to the journal specification
- Methodology of the research
- a) corresponds to needs of the article
- b) improper presented
- c) does not correspond to needs of the article
- Initial data
- a) sufficient
- b) insufficient
- Statistical investigation
- a) sufficient
- b) can be accepted after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
- c) insufficient
- Illustrations
- a) acceptable in quality and quantity
- b) quality of the illustration № ………………. is improper
- c) can be corrected
- d) unacceptable
- Tables and figures
- a) acceptable
- b) need improvement
- c) unacceptable or improper
- Interpretation of the research results
- a) acceptable
- b) can be accepted after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
- c) unacceptable or not understandable
- d) inconclusive
- Used literature
- a) acceptable in quality and quantity
- b) unacceptable because of insufficient number of entries
- c) unacceptable because of low quality (old, designed with violation of the requirements, etc.)
- d) lack of well-known (classic) sources concerning the article topic
- Units of measurement
- a) appropriate
- b) inappropriate
- Summary
- a) correct
- b) does not (completely) reveal idea of the article
- c) needs radical elaboration
- Assessment of linguistic aspect of the work
- a) good
- b) needs improvement
- c) needs radical elaboration
- General assessment and proposals concerning the article publication
- a) very good – can be accepted and published
- b) good – can be accepted and published after consideration of reviewer’s remarks
- c) can be accepted and published after radical elaboration
- d) cannot be published in the “Journal of Lviv National Agrarian University”
COMMENTS of the reviewer ABOUT assessment of the article:
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
reviewer’s signature
Scientific degree and academic title, full name of the reviewer